1. Circular reasoning
a use of reason in which the premises depends on or is equivalent to the conclusion, a method of false logic by which "this is used to prove that, and that is used to prove this"; also called circular logic
2. Ad hominem
1
: appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect
2
: marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
A fallacy in which the premise of an argument presupposes the truth of its conclusion; in other words, the argument takes for granted what it is supposed to prove.
4. Red herring
5. Straw man
A fallacy in which an opponent's argument is overstated or misrepresented in order to be more easily attacked or refuted.
6. Ad populum
A proposition is held to be true because it is widely held to
be true or is held to be true by some (usually upper crust)
sector of the population.
8. Post hoc
logical error: the fallacy of arguing that since one event happened before a second, the first caused the second
A fallacy in which any evidence that supports an opposing argument is simply rejected, omitted, or ignored.
10. False dilemma
A fallacy of oversimplification: an argument in which only two
alternatives are provided when in fact additional options are available.
Sometimes called the either-or fallacy.
I hope that this post has helped to clarify some of the more common logical fallacies out there and if you're interested in learning more you can find a comprehensive list at The Skeptic's Dictionary.
Sadly, the average Christian is merely a parrot for the William Lane Craig's who must know that their "reasoning" is fallacious. Craig should be ashamed of himself.
ReplyDeleteSo true! William Lane Craig loves to start all arguments with the presupposition that whatever he's arguing for is a "basic belief" and therefore true. He states religious tenets such as the resurrection of Christ as an indisputable fact!
DeleteI tire of religious people trying to apply reason to a matter of faith. Just own it, and we can sit on opposite sides of the room, smile at each other, and talk about our pets.
ReplyDeleteIt's not entirely their fault. They don't realize that you can't use reason to describe faith. They don't see that using the two words together is an oxymoron. Btw, my two dogs are pretty cute.
DeleteWe must take note that it isn't just Christians who use these tactics to dissuade anyone from questioning their religious beliefs. Muslims, theistic Buddhists, Pagans, theistic Satanists, they are are all equally guilty of running in circles dodging and misdirecting questions asked of them. I've had more than one run in with individuals from the aforementioned groups who seem to use the same check list of things to say in an argument with an Atheist, or someone of a different belief system.
ReplyDeleteYou're are absolutely right Ben! Most of the time I focus on Christianity because that is what I know better any other religion. But as you stated it applies to many other faith based beliefs.
DeleteHi would you mind sharing which blog platform you're working with? I'm
ReplyDeletegoing to start my own blog in the near future but I'm having a tough time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I'm looking
for something completely unique. P.
S Sorry for being off-topic but I had to ask!
My web-site: click here
This is blogger.com sign up with them and then start working on your page. Good luck my friend.
ReplyDelete